8/28/2023 0 Comments Cascadea armamentresearch, development and planned exports set. Congress should be conscientious of the precedents that U.S. While no state has ever built a bomb with material from a safeguarded nuclear facility, civil nuclear programs have been used as cover for technology acquisition or expertise development. After all, civil nuclear energy programs affect proliferation but are not the main driver. The goal should be to make it difficult to divert materials in the nuclear fuel cycle from power generation to nuclear weapons. To minimize risk, the federal government must carefully assess what programs to support to instill “proliferation resistance” and “safeguards and security by design” from the beginning, as it is much harder to add later. Further, the development and planned export of certain technologies could break with long-standing non-proliferation policy. However, advanced reactors pose new risks all along the supply chain and may require the development of new safeguards techniques. Supporters of advanced reactors often point to nuclear power’s possible role in tackling climate change and the utility of setting non-proliferation, nuclear security and nuclear safety standards with importing countries. The question for the federal government should be which of the possible avenues maximizes safety and minimizes proliferation risk. non-proliferation policy than they are worth. The nuclear industry is developing several promising new technologies to meet the demand for “green” energy, but some may do more damage to U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |